Common Contract Breach Defenses
POSTED ON February 11, 2022
When one party breaches a contract, it can be costly for the other party involved. Depending on the situation, there are a variety of defenses that can be used to fight a breach of contract claim. This article will highlight some of the most common defenses used in business disputes. If you are facing a breach of contract claim, it is important to understand these defenses and how they may apply to your situation. Contact an experienced Florida business litigation attorney for more information.
Top Defenses to a Breach of Contract Claim
There are a number of common defenses to a breach of contract claim. Some of the most common include:
Lack of Performance
This defense asserts that the party alleging the breach did not perform their obligations as outlined in the contract. For example, if Party A agreed to sell Party B 500 widgets and only delivered 400 widgets, then Party A may be able to raise lack of performance as a defense if Party B asserts that they breached the contract by failing to deliver all 500 widgets.
Impossibility or Impracticality
This defense is based on the idea that it was impossible for a party to perform their obligations under the contract. This defense cannot be used if the impossibility was caused by the actions of the party claiming impossibility.
Improper Performance
This defense is based on a claim that although one party performed their obligations under the contract, they did not do so in a way that was consistent with the contract.
Frustration of Purpose
This defense can be raised when one party to a contract is unable to fulfill its obligations due to unforeseen circumstances. This defense may be available when the event that frustrates the purpose of the contract is not caused by either party, is not foreseeable, and is beyond the control of either party.
Lack of Capacity
This defense is based on the idea that either minors or those who are mentally incompetent cannot legally enter into a contract. Therefore, they cannot be held liable for breach of contract.
Undue Influence or Duress
This defense is based on the idea that one party coerced another party into entering into a contract through improper means.
Fraud and Misrepresentation
This defense is based on the idea that one party lied or misrepresented the true terms of their contract in order to get another party to enter into it.
Unconscionability
This defense is based on the idea that a contract is so unfair or one-sided that it cannot be enforced.
Unilateral or Mutual Mistake
Unilateral and mutual mistakes are two commonly asserted contract defenses. In both cases, there has been a misunderstanding between the parties regarding an important aspect of their agreement.
In unilateral mistake, only one party is mistaken about the terms of the contract.
In mutual mistake, both parties are mistaken about an important aspect of the contract.
Lack of Consent
The parties to a contract must have the capacity or ability to consent in order for an agreement to be valid. If that consent is forced by fraud, duress, or undue influence, it can render any subsequent agreement void or unenforceable. In other words for there to be consideration on both sides of a contract each party must have the ability to make a choice. A court will find that this capacity is lacking if an individual was unable to understand what he or she was doing because of mental incapacity, intoxication, youth, duress, or undue influence.
Statute of Frauds
A common contract breach defense is the Statute of Frauds. The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires some types of contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable. This law exists to prevent people from making fraudulent claims about agreements that were never actually made. There are several different types of contracts that are covered by the Statute of Frauds, including contracts for the sale of goods worth more than $500, contracts that cannot be completed within one year, and contracts for the sale of land or real estate.
Each of these defenses has its own specific requirements in order to be successful. It is important to consult with an attorney if you are facing a breach of contract claim to determine which defense may be the best fit for your situation. Contact our breach of contract attorneys today for a consultation.
Your property. Your rights. Our fight.
Yanet Macias2025-05-19Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I would proudly recommend Michael Mayoral and Maria Agudelo to anyone needing legal representation.They were always clear,prompt and responsive,even with late night questions.Im very grateful for the hard work and dedication Michael,Maria and the entire team, to be able to achieve a great outcome. Pasteur Water System2025-05-16Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. An excellent team of professionals. Their legal advice is clear, timely, and effective. Highly recommended for those seeking legal solutions with commitment and integrity. Alvaro Duarte2025-05-15Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Manejamos un caso con la firma Pérez Mayoral y el resultado fue muy satisfactorio para nosotros, en este país es importante contar una buena firma de abogados Daniel Eliut Perez Contreras2025-05-15Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Buena atencion, siempre muy atentos, excelente representacion, recomendados 100 % Gravitas HQ2025-05-14Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Spoke to Erik Perez about a situation with a client and he provided great information to help. Overall very knowledgeable and informative experience. C H2025-05-14Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Just had a consultation with Erik Perez really nice and really good information explained everything perfectly and gave us some new information if you need a consultation would definitely recommend these people will definitely come to them if we pursue a case! Pickleball Sales2025-05-13Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Really intelligent Lawyers Ashley mcnamara2025-05-11Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. So from the very first interaction I had with Michael Mayoral he was professional, answered all my questions and took his time with me. Even throughout the process of my lawsuit anytime I had a question they always got back to me as soon as possible, no matter if it was him personally or the case managers or my attorney Maria Agudelo (who I absolutely loved working with). I highly recommend working with them. Mung Kang2025-05-01Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Erik is very good lawyer and patient.Google rating score: 4.8 of 5, based on 391 reviews